This was filed on November 18th, 2019; it is PLAINTIFF’S RULE 37(c) MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR MATERIAL DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS AND/OR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PERMIT LIMITED DISCOVERY ON RECENTLY UNCOVERED MATERIAL EVIDENCE. After Zarzaur received the texts from the PBA and well…here ya go.
The most important pages are below. For the whole document, click here. The exhibits are here.
Morgan and Haines are caught in lies under oath yet. Bill Eddins says their lying.
As for the exhibits, this is the most exculpatory is his list of sex cases of officers listed by Morgan, is less than truthful.
Morgan’s response as flimsy as it is can be found here.
Officer Zaid is missing. Officer Custer is also missing. The CFO, Henrique Dias who allegedly got caught in another jurisdiction with a transvestite prostitute. Another set of employees were caught having sex on duty in the garage parking lot. Oh and how about the civilian who was caught exposing himself at the Creighton Rd. Walmart. Employees of a news outlet attest to being on site after hearing the incident on a police scanner. Somehow it is alleged that Morgan talked to the PPD and got that incident erased. Unfortunately, there were a few witnesses who have nothing to gain by telling this tale. Even if the CFO and the civilian incidents can’t be documented, thanks to Morgan and Haines having evidence destroyed, the others are disturbingly absent from the list. Why?
They are others that are alleged but also cannot be proven due to the lack of documentation generated on the incidence. In the texts, Haines talks about not wanting Tyree to “create a public record” with the PBA letter. That is a theme I have heard about too many times. In speaking of the texts, I am mentioned a number of times within them.
I love to see how much I’m in their heads, particularly Debra Little. She seems to have a contempt for me that is stronger than I would have guessed. Oh well. I will let the documents speak for themselves. I don’t believe it is too difficult to glean the intent of Morgan and Haines in these documents.
The recent text messages from the ECSO have been eye opening. I believe with the help of people on the inside, former employees and inane press conferences by Sir David (that never show him in a positive light) that the ECSO is in a death spiral. The texts corroborate every story and every person who has come forward about the lack of morality and the nonexistent rules for some and high threshold morality imposed on others (shown for Steve Kay’s profanity). The lack of leadership from the top spot was inevitably going to have adverse effect on the agency, which is seen in the lack of leadership and malleability of Haines’s piety and intangible common sense of everyone blindly following the leader, which is Nazi-esque in nature. Remember the Nuremburg Trials? Just following orders blindly is the name of the game in order to preserve oneself. Did Morgan believe he could hoodwink citizens forever? His display of clueless antics, in pretending to be a career law enforcement officer, have simply become dangerous for the citizens.
Morgan has no experience in relevant law enforcement. He has never held a certification in any state or city. He has never made an arrest of a criminal. He has never investigated a crime as a law enforcement officer (except for his lame attempt in the Billings case where he appeared on the scene and interviewed people there that night but those notes nor those people were ever included in any documentation of the case.) His experience is made up of patchwork resumes and lies that he spreads to the citizens of our county as
The recent text messages from Chief Haines should be paradigm shift to even the most staunch of Morgan proponents that the foundation of this agency is not worthy of supporting a real law enforcement agency. It is common knowledge that Haines has never been much of a law enforcement officer himself. What was discovered is that the common bond of the ignorance of how to be a law enforcement officer (much less leader) which has brought Haines and Morgan closer. Like the manipulation of facts, the backstabbing maneuvers of Haines, Morgan and Debra Little their counsel should be appalling to the constituents and to law enforcement officers that know what strong
The most disgraceful thing is watching Morgan, Haines and Little eviscerate the United States Constitution. We have seen Morgan ask for the surveillance of ‘hater sites’ because of public exposure of wrongdoing by the ECSO. Which brings me to a more appropriate question which is to ask Morgan to identify the criteria used to label “haters” and the sites believed to belong to these haters. The 4th amendment is clear on the surveillance requirements of a law enforcement agency. What makes an individual a “hater” verses a citizen providing oversight to a public official elected by citizens of Escambia County?
Also, we know that Due Process has little impact on decisions of Morgan or Haines. Anyone attempting to exercise their rights are met with persecution in the form of a barrage of stone casting and character assassination. Most of the litigation against the ECSO involves the attempt to deny rights and retaliation against those in opposition of the ECSO poor leadership. Morgan, Haines and Little have ignored the law and their obligation to not only enforce our laws but to protect the Constitution. When the time
comes, they will expect to have the benefit of Due Process for themselves when the agency eventually implodes, which it will. Some would say that they should be treated the way they treat others. I disagree. I want to be better than they are and feel confident that should REAL justice will be served by law abiding professional who can follow the law in prosecuting these criminals. The corruption they are facilitating will be
proven while observing ALL their rights. Only then will a victory for justice occur. The best way to win is to be honest and play by the rules.
Texts from Sir David, Chief Nonsense (Haines) and Debra Little, their in-house counsel show how the highest law enforcement echelon within the ECSO view criticism and the people who openly criticize them. They also demonstrate how much they need their egos stroked. Or maybe brown nosing is Haines’s super power.
Condescendingly blather about the strife of the county seems to elicit humor. And of course, releasing info to disparage “the haters”, knowing full well it is untrue also seems to create a chuckle. Their perception of what the public cares about is so skewed that they don’t see that the mistreatment of their employees just shows they have no respect for any one in the community. Is this really what the Sheriff and his staff should be concerning themselves with?
Once upon a time, when people spoke of Escambia County Sheriff’s Office, there was respect in their voices, an air of reverence and admiration that went without question. Now, there is just an aura of malevolence and shame. That is all that remains.
We all are aware that Morgan is NOT any example of a law enforcement officer. We are also cognizant that Haines is not any closer to be a cop than Morgan. His success come from instilling fear, manipulating honorable people into dubious situations for no better reason than he wants to control. In order to survive, “yes men & women” are necessary to fall in line. Rank and file led by historic failures and an embarrassment to law enforcement.
Recently, there was a public records request obtained that included text messages from ECSO staff members. It should be noted the texts are from people in leadership positions at the ECSO. The same people making decisions about how to investigate cases, make arrests and keep the community safe. These same people are responsible for deciding the fate of so many people without opposition or any check and balance.
During the summer of 2019, make-believe investigation was ordered on Chief Deputy Eric Haines by Sheriff David Morgan. This supposed investigation was to be centered around his treatment of females. Keep in mind that a Federal Court judge has ruled long ago that Eric Haines had displayed conduct that indicated gender bias. The investigator assigned was Mindy von Ansbach Young, who is a subordinate of Chief Haines. Young is in the chain of command for Haines. Still Morgan believed it was a good idea to have a subordinate investigate a supervisor.
Surprisingly, Young fulfilled the dog and pony show of an investigation and it was determined that Chief Haines had committed no violation! How lucky for him. The following text messages were obtained from the ECSO through a hard-fought public records request. The content speaks for itself. Incomprehensibly, Young seems to deeply admire Haines. For this reason, she should have never been assigned to investigate him.