How Do You Know It’s HIS Penis?!?

Most people who have followed my blog know that the ECSO has a sliding scale of morality and discipline. For instance, Mark Turner, who was caught in a room naked with a prostitute. He is recorded talking about drugs he seized but didn’t turn in that he was giving to said prostitute. He was allowed to resign. And those same powers-that-be have a disinclination to punish cancers like former Chief deputy Eric Haines. That doesn’t go unnoticed.

Now we have the same selective punishment in Santa Rosa. There are so many documents and files I have on the Scott Haines debacle. Here is one clip from an interview with an SRSO employee conducted by Shane Tucker in reference to the “Dildo Panties” incidence:

This is just a clip:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This is the transcript of that clip:


Tucker
when we were talking about an incident that occurred best to your recollection. It was in 2016. And it would have been prior to Captain Haines, the incident where he came to to your house. Tell me about that incidence.


SRSO employee
He had sent me a photo.

Tucker
Okay.

SRSO employee
And then it wasn’t until this year that I realized it was from his work phone.

Tucker
Okay.

Tucker
So when you say he sent, like, a text message, he sent a photo via text.

SRSO employee
it was ….Yes.

Tucker
And of himself. When you say self, was it his penis? his penis?

SRSO employee
yes

Tucker
How do you know that it was his penis?

SRSO employee
I guess it could have been anyone else’s, but he said it was his.

Tucker
Okay.

Tucker
Was it erect / flacid? or….

SRSO employee
It was erect.


Tucker
Okay.

Tucker
And it was in a shower?


SRSO employee
Yes.


Tucker
How did that come about?


SRSO employee

From what the best I can’t remember, because it was three years ago was that I woke up one the next morning and I had the picture.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Pardon my ignorance on this but would it really matter if the penis was erect or flacid? Or even if it wasn’t Scott’s? It simply wasn’t appropriate…..PERIOD

But again evidently watching porn and communicating with prostitutes on tax payers’ dimes is only a problem if you aren’t in the clique of cool kids. There are so many ethics issues in the handling of Haines by Wendell Hall and Bob Johnson. So either Scott has so much dirt on the two of them or there is a financial incentive that may soon become apparent, for these two “leaders’ to forget the difference in right and wrong. The fact that this one guy gets SUCH a pass, makes me question the moral foundation of this agency.

How can an agency punish anyone for anything when Haines got a pass on so many violations and crimes? This has to be extremely toxic to everyone who has been employed there over the last decade. If you spent years doing the “right things” and avoiding ethical or political landmines, is it just enough to know you did a good job when you see Scott walking around the agency?

And when is it exactly too much and Scott has to be cut loose? The final IA is an investigation the FBI forwarded to Bob, already completed. It took them compiling things from years ago, that were brought up repetitively in the past before SRSO even took any of these allegations seriously. It had been reported that Scott misused government resources; Chris Watson, claimed there was nothing there ( without pulling any log ins—or at least attaching them to the IA file). It was reported Scott was misusing his position with SRSO to exploit a lady with substantial property holdings (that have appreciated significantly due to their location over the years); again Watson said there was nothing to that claim either or the allegation he was targeting Matt Groelinger, the grandson of Dorothy Rogers). Yet anyone with an IQ over that of cabbage can see that absolutely was a valid complaint. In hindsight this proved to be the last straw and something the SRSO turned a blind eye to, facilitating Scott to victimize more people.

Chris Watson, the investigator who certified Scott was not doing any of these things, should have his competency questioned. Either he is such a shitty investigator as to never have had any skills that rise to obligation of any job in law enforcement, or he’s a do-boy who has no moral compass.

No matter which is true, can you trust anything the SRSO has done? This applies to Bob’s understanding of what a law enforcement agency is supposed to be but as we know having a law enforcement background is not a prerequisite to being Sheriff; look at David Morgan. So it’s possible even with his years of service, he is not a person who was ever up to the task of protecting and serving the public.

As I stated above, people don’t understand the history between Scott and this family. I wanted to point out the dates of the events that were used to terminate Scott.

Keep in mind there were SRSO investigations into these acts but they were written off as “UNSUBSTANTIATED”. In 2012, Bill Sumner wrote a complaint that Scott used NCIC for non-law enforcement purposes (to repo cars). Chris Watson attempted to contact Sumner. When he couldn’t get a hold of him, he effectively closed the complaint. The NCIC records and video footage would have corroborated Sumner’s accusations but Watson failed to do so or failed to include those findings. Because he got away with that, he continued to re-abuse his power to misuse his position. These complaints show a pattern of behavior never properly been investigated by SRSO

In 2015, 2 days after Matt Groelinger filed a complaint against Haines for taking advantage of his position in the community to exploit his grandmother, Scott ran him through NCIC. In idoing his sub-par investigating of that complaint, Watson should have checked that to see if there was any malfeasance. That would have been a basic element of the so-called investigation. However, he failed to do so before closing that complaint as UNFOUNDED.

Again this was still a closed matter in 2021–that is until the FBI provided findings throughout this debacle with Dorothy Rogers family to the SRSO (2015-2018). At different milestones through this lawsuit filed by Groelinger the SRSO, Scott ran Groelinger, in different vehicles and members of his legal team. These are the things that ultimately got him terminated, reluctantly by SRSO, but insisted upon by FDLE & FBI. How many other violations did he commit like this, ie renters or love interests?

Who besides Watson, Hall/Johnson, covered this crap up? The conspiracy herein is going to be the most intriguing part. Who else was involved? What motivation was there? How many documents were either not collected or destroyed in this collusion? In my experience those are hallmarks of said conspiracies that I have seen. Like, Morgan refusing to do much of his “business” via email because he avoided the public records law. Then Wil Meloy destroying records of emails sent and received during the fanfare of the Billings media circus. This is corroborated via text messages obtained by the PBA. There are face to face requests with Meloy with Eric Haines on days I put pressure on the agency for such emails and the fact it is a felony to destroy communication relating to a death penalty case. Meloy claims he handled this situation. Some emails were finally presented but it is illogical to think no one emailed the “honorable” Sheriff on his handling of the Billings case.

That is just one issue I believe will be evident in the SRSO-Haines scandal. Destruction of records and failure to obtain/maintain such records is a far lesser crime that criminal collusion.

If anyone has info as to that cover up or even the ESCO issues, please contact me.

  2 comments for “How Do You Know It’s HIS Penis?!?

  1. John
    November 16, 2021 at 8:26 pm

    That wasn’t Chris Watson in the recording. The voice you heard was Assistant Chief Shane Tucker, the investigating officer. Having worked with both extensively I easily recognize Tucker’s voice in the recording talking to the SRSO Employee.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: