The Haines brothers just keep on victimizing people and very little is being done to protect the community from these guys.
Chief Deputy Eric Haines had his PBA membership revoked due to his continuous malfeasance and abuse of officers’ rights. No one has ever had their membership revoked. One person was unseated from the PBA board, but he still maintained his regular membership. This is huge. His actions are contrary to the mission statement and fundamental operations of the PBA. What does that say? This is unprecedented.
Oh and remember the “cancer sex” website he wanted to start. That nugget of info came out in Laura Montoya’s case. Common theme….sexual harassment.
The Santa Rosa Sheriff’s Office demoted Scott Haines after an IA investigation corroborated, in part, the sexual harassment of a subordinate. The finding of dildo underwear in his desk was the part being disciplined. The investigation concluded everything else is “he said” “she said”.
With his prior IA for viewing porn on his office computer as well as answering personal ads on Craigslist for hookups, there should be little doubt this guy is a sexual problem that is just amplifying due to the lack of REAL discipline. This dude is a threat to the community. Let’s not forget, he is exploiting an old lady for her money.
Why the hell are these guys allowed to oversee any staff at all? What the hell happened to these guys growing up that they have such vile proclivities to victimize people? Sexual abuse ? Possibly. All I can say for sure is these dudes should never be able to use their position, power or standing in the community to prey on said community.
There are serious sexual issues in these two departments. These two brothers are at the center of it all.
Previously I posted on Scott Haines an SRSO officer who wormed his way into a family, isolated a 90 year old woman with Alzheimer’s, Dorothy Rogers, and convinced her that her family was out “to put her away”. By detaching her from her family, via false accusations, civil complaint, and arrest warrant, Scott convinced her that only he was looking out for her welfare, being a law enforcement officer sold it. Aren’t cops supposed to be the “good guys”?
He got her to change an Irrevocable Trust by arresting the trustee, the person who is entrusted to protect the trust, Matthew Groelinger, for stealing from her estate, exploitation of an elderly person. Those charges were later dismissed, nolle proseqi, but only after Scott was named the new trustee of Rogers Trust and Estate, valued into the millions of dollars in real estate and assets. New documents have been released, authenticating Haines’s abuse of power and profiteering off of this woman.
This is the link to land sales to Haines for the sales of tracts of land owned by Rogers, deeded to Haines for $20 each (estimated value of each tract is $20K+).
These are the links to evictions from Rogers’s trailer park, executed by Rogers. The notes in Rogers own handwriting show her confusion and that she, not only believes Scott is her grandson, but that he is forcing her to evict these people and she doesn’t know why.
SR Clerk 8.18.17 Rogers vs Botcher #10
SR Clerk 11.18.16 Public Nuissance #14
SR Clerk 10.3.17 Rogers v Bishop #8
SR Clerk 7.24.18 Rogers v Dempsey #3
SR Clerk 7.19.18 Rogers v Walther #6
SR Clerk 7.19.18 Rogers v DJones #4
SR Clerk 5.9.16 Petty Theft #23
SR Clerk 2.5.19 Rogers v Clayberger #2
The victims of Eric Haines of Escambia County is vast and been seen here in various posts; however, this is first post in that most people get to see the Haines Brothers are truly birds of a feather and the DNA link can be seen in the victims they choose.
A civil lawsuit was filed over the weekend exposing Scott Haines’s exploitation of a mentally impaired, elderly woman in Santa Rosa County who has vast properties and net worth. The official allegations are as follows:
- False Imprisonment/Arrest
- Civil Conspiracy to Elicit False Imprisonment/Arrest
- Malicious Prosecution
- Tortious Interference with a Business Relationship
- Conspiracy to Tortious Interfere with a Business Relationship
- Abuse of Power
- Civil Conspiracy to Provide False Information that Becomes Part of a Public Record to Further a Felony (Exploitation of the Elderly)
- Common Law Negligent Retention & Supervision
Here are the basic facts:
A. DCF/ APS Report
B. Baker Act Documents
C. Deposition of Deputy Marshall Kilburn
D. Deposition of Dorothy Rogers
E. Deposition of Scott Haines
F. Land Sales to Haines
G. Email from Asst. State Attorney Liles to Brian Hoffman
Important facts to remember in this situation:
- This was set up as an IRREVOCABLE TRUST by Rogers and her family when her mental acuity was NOT in question.
- The only way Haines could get this irrevocable trust revoked is by staging a scenario to appear like Rogers’s grandson exploited her. This was done via the false arrest as DCF/APS report did not corroborate this allegation.
- A determination of dementia was made by the physician Ms. Rogers had for an extensive period of time. Doctors who subsequently contradicted this spent far less time with Ms. Rogers.
- There is a monumental value to Ms. Rogers’s real estate holdings in the eye of the Department of the Navy.
Railroading people is a hereditary act in the case of the Haines brothers. Their greed and need for power combined with their position of power in their respective communities, makes them extremely dangerous to anyone they set their sights on.
Oh also, Eric Haines is in pictures with Scott Haines and Dorothy Rogers. So maybe there is a cross county conspiracy here too.