Lieutenant Steve Cappas & Deputy Zach Ward were deposed in the Rogers vs. Morgan civil case. Under oath, both ECSO employees contend evidence was not properly stored in a secured location and reports were missing from case file.
Zach Ward, the first of the two to be deposed, says that chain of evidence was in tact up until the reports he created on the composition of Leah Manning’s devices in this sexual abuse case. In review of the case file, it becomes obvious the reports Ward claim to have run on the evidence he received in 2015 were not in the case file but a second examination of the phone of Leah Manning had been inexplicably run over a year later and was in the file where his report should have been.
In Lt. Cappas’s deposition, this is what he says about storage of evidence
When asked where Leah Manning’s IPad is, Cappas replied
Cappas was asked about the fact Morgan’s number was in Leah’s phone and the veracity of the statements made by Morgan in his press conference
When Cappas was asked about my blog publishing that Leah had the Morgan’s number
My sources that forwarded me that letter asked that I pull it down. They feel their openness will cause retaliation and may affect lawsuits pending. Because I am a person of my word, the story has been pulled for now but I would like to post a document that says most of the same things.
” This case against defendant SHERIFF DAVID MORGAN “Sheriff Morgan” as representative of Escambia County Sheriff’s Office involves allegations that the Sheriff’s office was deliberately indifferent to the sexual activity between 20 to 30 ECSO deputies and Leah Manning. The allegations include arguments that the Sheriff’s Office Internal Affairs Division purposely ignored a sex ring that was occurring between deputies and Leah Manning, many of whom were visiting the Manning house during work hours.”
“This deliberate indifference to its own policies allowed for more and more sexual activity with Leah Manning, most of which occurred in the family home while the minors were present. Testimony has established that the internal affairs investigation into the two deputies that were charged with sexual abuse of the Plaintiffs was curtailed by ECSO administration because they felt it would be a “public relations” nightmare.”
“Despite the fact that ECSO had Leah Manning’s cell records which indicated graphic/sexual text between her and various ECSO deputies, IA investigators were instructed that looking into these other acts would be “running down a rabbit trail,” and they were instructed to focus on the narrow the scope of their investigation and ignore the potential sheriff office policy violations since behavior between “consenting adults” was not material to them.”
As it has been predicted, the prophesy that Chief Deputy Simmons (aka Chipper) would be more of the same if elected to the office of Sheriff, has come to fruition. Several months ago, an employee outed an affair Chipper was involved in. She was disciplined for having an extramarital affair. Naturally, wanting the policies and rules to be evenly upheld, the employee believed it was wrong that she would be disciplined for an affair and Chief Simmons would not suffer any discipline for having an extramarital affair himself. There were ample details given to investigate this Chipper’s affair via a complaint made to the ECSO. This entire situation should have been investigated, especially since one of the possible victims of the extramarital affair is an employee at the ECSO and Chief Simmons is his boss.
Ultimately, two employees lost their jobs for having an affair. Neither employee was a part of the reported Chipper’s affair. The affair he had (or is having) was never investigated. The rules apparently don’t apply to Pensacola’s fair-haired boy. While the public once saw him as their favored and “honest” political personality, and he played the part by acting like such, he can no longer deny he is just as corrupt and as much of a hypocrite as Morgan or Haines.
The sad part is his conscience isn’t impeding his race for the top. Just imagine, knowing two employees were terminated, effectively ending their careers, for having an affair and you are doing the same thing without fall-out, should weigh heavy if you have any moral compass at all. Yet, with Chipper, not so much. He smiles and shakes hands with campaign donors while the people under him see him as minion of Morgan. As long as he abandons those he is supposed to lead (as he did when Haines held well earned raises over their heads) and stands by watching careers go down the drain for things he is guilty of while he basks in the sunlight, he doesn’t deserve the public trust just like the current administration doesn’t deserve the public respect and trust that was placed in them.
Let’s not forget there is a husband who calls Chipper his boss. This man must smile and grin, knowing that his boss is sleeping with his wife. That is twisted. That within itself is just not the stuff true leaders are made of. Playing Devil’s advocate, if this is purely rumor wouldn’t any competent leader want to get to the truth in this matter? However, it seems like, if an investigation were started, it would be documented that Chipper is an adulterer and has abused his power over the husband of his mistress and that is no good for political campaign.
Chipper wants to be the top law enforcement officer in our county. The citizens have the right to know if he is the person, he claims he is. He has worked diligently in his career to build a reputation in the public eye. Yet in almost 4 short years since he was hired, he has become as vile as the man that hired him. I, personally, would like to see some questions answered. I, personally, would like to see an appropriate investigation into this matter. I’d like to see him explain why an extramarital affair makes him worthy of being a Sheriff.
A true investigation would find Chipper involved in an extramarital affair and then there would be questions. He would have to answer why he watched two employees lose their careers because of something he was also doing without consequence. He would need to explain what makes him believe he should be Sheriff after lying about having an affair. I would want to know if he ever feels guilty for allowing himself to avoid responsibility for an act that cost others their career. Two people he knew well and worked with daily. People that he knew was aware of his inappropriate relationship if determined to be true.
One other question of great interest to the ECSO deputies is why he was exploiting his brother’s nepotism. Ken Simmons, Chipper’s brother, was promoted to a Captains position. There is not a career path for becoming a Captain. Historically it has been a political appointment. Morgan promoted Chipper’s brother when the statute is clearly being violated. None of the leadership at the ECSO stepped in and voiced concern for blatant law violations. (FSS 112. 3135) It would be difficult to argue Chipper had no input in the matter or for that matter, that it appears that Morgan was doing him a favor by promoting his brother over more competent candidates.
Neither issue is as concerning to the public as the deafening silence by Chipper, while he is able to make changes. If he is not actually allowed to rule against Haines, then he must be courageous enough to step away and fight to be elected. Taking a path of going along to get along is discouraging. That isn’t a new idea at the ECSO. That is an example of what is not needed. There have been several attempts to reach out to Simmons and beg for his leadership. He has ignored all the calls from employees to help the ECSO survive the failure of leadership. Tell me again why this is the person for the job of Sheriff?
So as many know I have been asking for emails to and from David Morgan and the national news outlets from 7/9-7/15/2009 (the Billings Murder). In 2015, Eric Haines attempted to extortion by demanding $50 for providing an estimate of $7000+ worth of emails. This extortion continued for 2 years. I could not request public records until I paid for an estimate that was crazy stupid. This is a public records violation in and of itself. Realizing how serious this was, Haines allowed me to request other records. How very white of him!
Anyway, the line the ECSO towed after this is that there were no records relevant to my request. Then last year it changed again; the line was “there was no records in the Sheriff’s custody to fulfill the request”. Even the response from Beth Medeiros has this line in quotes…no doubt a line Haines advised her to relay. You see the games they are playing, right? Well, I asked Hayley Minogue, former WKRG reporter, if she would request the same emails as to see if the answer would be the same or if they were just screwing with me. Sure enough, the quoted line was the response.
So, I analyzed the wording, “in the Sheriff’s custody”; ok, maybe there is a county backup server that I can request these emails from. So I emailed Shawn Fletcher, the IT director for the BOCC. I asked that very question. He explained the ECSO has its own backup server that is maintained by their head of IT, Will Meloy. He forwarded my request to Will and was confident that I should hear back by the end of the week. Two weeks pass and nothing. I email Shawn again asking if I understood him correctly and he said again they handle their own backups.
Why such pushback for these emails? I don’t know if there is anything in them but the pushback tells me 4 years later, there is something damning in there, because risking so many violations of Florida Statute over emails with nothing in them?
Reluctantly, I compiled all my documentation and forwarded it to SAO and Greg Marcille, specifically. I had zero confidence in this step as we all know the SAO has covered many crimes such as LET misappropriation for years. The AG and Governor were virtually worthless in years past, telling me to sue or go to the FBI. But we are talking about misdemeanors for the most part and that is not FBI worthy; hell, I knew that, but for public officials it is huge. The people enforcing the laws should comply with them. However, now we have a new AG and Governor, who seems to be no nonsense. I thought I’d try again.
Greg Marcille responded to me.
On Monday 5/13, I emailed Marcille for an update since 21 days had lapse. I was expectantly disappointed by an email from Jody, Marcille’s executive secretary saying the ECSO asked for more time to respond. When I asked how much time, I got crickets. So this was my next email:
As of yet, no response. Unaccountable AGAIN. Not a pair of balls in the county, I’m afraid. Nuclear it is.
The Escambia County Sheriff’s Office staff continues to
demonstrate a lack of ability to lead the agency. So often Haines has been
motivated to prove he is correct in any chosen dispute. Haines has described
himself as having an “issue” with having to be right in any argument. In fact,
Haines gave a presentation during a training class that described his
irrational behavior concerning having to be correct. In the class, he gave
numerous examples that ranged from family vacations to holidays.
There was one fact that everyone could agree on after
participating in training class. Haines was such a narcissist he believed that rationalizing
his irrational behavior showed how tailored he was to his job and how people
must adjust to him in order to have the chance stay at this job. He was so
captivated with himself that he didn’t realize he had just proved he was every
bit the ego maniac everyone has claimed he was. His belief is that his own
erratic and self-absorbed behavior had become an asset to others historically
and therefore was a virtue not a shortcoming. He will go into detail to members
of the ECSO about his “virtue” and explain why everyone should appreciate it.
He is willing to openly describe family events that would make him look
transparent and human. The flaw in that logic is the assumption that his self-important
narcissism is the presumption he is actually always right. His version of right
must be universal in his own mind. Yet he cannot control the thinking of
others. So, no matter how long he elaborates on how “right” he is, people may
only acquiesce to shut him up, and never agree that he is truly right. More
likely, he is only living in a delusion of “rightness” not the actuality of
being always right.
Many of the horror stories from the ECSO begin with Haines
and end with Haines. His career as a “law enforcement officer” is like comparing
a Dr. Seuss to a cardiovascular surgeon. Haines has never completed a true
investigation on any major crime. His law enforcement career consisted of going
to school and being promoted. Unfortunately, he was not able to achieve much
success as an officer. I say unfortunately, not because he wasn’t a good cop, some
people just don’t have what it takes to effectively master the psychology of
effectively doing the job. It is unfortunate because he must feel he has
something to prove to all the people that have been good cops. It is possible
Haines would have been different had he possessed the skills necessary to be a
Haines tries to square his deficiencies by using power to
bully people. This works some of the time. Haines recently asked for an opinion
from the Attorney Generals Office. This is a process that is not uncommon.
Often there will be a need for the AG to provide guidance to those navigating
the law. I believe it would be unfair to criticize Haines for wanting an
opinion before deciding on an issue. However, I would expect, if the AG is
asked for an opinion, the issue would be extremely important. It would be an
issue that would not be a waste of time for the office handling the request.
This opinion would make the ECSO become more professional and provide better
service to the citizens. Yet it is wrong to make that assumption, in this case.
Haines asked for an opinion concerning internal investigations.
Haines wants an opinion that supports his belief to strip an employee of all 1st
amendment rights, while under investigation. He has refused to allow union
representatives and attorneys to speak during an internal investigation. The
statute is clear and leaves no room restrict a person not accused of a crime
and not in custody. Haines, in true malicious fashion, seeks an AG opinion when
he is finally faced with a situation, he can’t use bully tactics to win. It is
a tremendous amount of effort for a case that involves an employee NOT accused
of any crime.
The real reason for the effort is Haines is losing the
argument. He is hoping for an opinion from the AG that no one can debate. He
wants anything but a loss in the situation. He shows no shame in wasting the tax
dollars for the time of actual leaders doing a job expected by the taxpayers. Haines
has one goal. WIN THE ARGUMENT!
This pathetic individual and his abusive tactics are no
secret to Morgan. Morgan is complicit in this as well. His refusal to stand for
what is lawful is criminal. Morgan has allowed poor leadership to adversely
impact the future of law enforcement in our county. The ECSO has had hundreds
of officers and civilians leave or be terminated from employment in less than
three years. Haines admitted that the agency is actually losing 4 times the
state average in employee loss. One
answer could be that the ECSO is just so unlucky that they get 4 times the
derelict applicants than the rest of the state receives. But that doesn’t explain the loss of double to
triple digit veteran employees either forced to leave or forced into
retirement. When you have a Chief Deputy that has never made a case or
investigated a major crime the problem should be clear. He initiates or causes
internal investigations to initiate on deputies when in fact, he has never
successfully completed a real investigation. Exactly as it has been said,
Haines under the misdirection of Morgan, is the problem. Neither has obtained
any level of respect in their law enforcement career. Both are egotistical and
self-serving. Both want to show people they have the power. Morgan ruined every
relationship with any other agency and Haines destroyed the morale within the
agency. Unknown amounts of money wasted and unknown costs to the community in
these two inept men who happen to be in leadership positions without being
The tide is changing, according to people in the department.
Morgan is seeing he is only a sheriff who doesn’t get to make every decision on
a whim. He has been halted in his steps for the first time. We could be
witnessing Morgan losing his Mojo. Haines gets to work on his biggest case
ever. A case that will do nothing to reduce crime. A case that has no victim or
property loss. A case where there is no crime committed. A case that Haines
must be proven right even if it destroys another life or family. A sacrifice
Haines is willing to make for the sake of his ego.
One thing in life is always true. The sun doesn’t shine on the same dogs’ ass every day. Eric, you know your time is coming. The lies and deceit that you have been a part of will all be answered in time. You will soon be in a place you are for sure not familiar with…………. court. A level playing field void of the many shadows you have become so accustomed to hiding. Soon a place that you will not be able to fire the people that point out your hypocritical and destructive style you have fashioned. I look forward to seeing you there. I wouldn’t miss the show.
I wasn’t going to dignify this video with a response but I reconsidered. It is important to speak out when it is necessary and this video reverberates the lack of respect this man has for his constituents. This was an overblown social media story that was essentially a misunderstanding but instead of correcting the misperception, Sir David decided to mock and even arrest a constituent because this misunderstanding.
Without further adieu, the Famous Chicken Video….
The fact he is the citizen thought they heard a gunshot and it was simultaneously when the deputy rolled by with his window open. If you perhaps heard, then exactly what happened might be ambiguous. That being said the deputy didn’t stop to say check on the animal or attempt to locate the owner as he would have probably done had it been a conventional pet. The fact he didn’t stop added to the misunderstanding of what happened. Had he stopped, he could have cleared the situation up immediately. But instead, he drove away knowing that there were witnesses. The owner was subsequently arrested for filing a false police report because he stated the officer shot the chicken.
Morgan is effectively mocking his constituents and looks like an ass in doing so. This situation was unfortunate but it was preventable with clarification and by not belittling the situation or people involved. It shows how low Morgan is for assuming he is any better than anyone, particularly when this same deputy was allowed to resign last week after being caught in a prostitution sting involving him providing illegal drugs for sex.
Now view the moral high ground the Sheriff is taking. He sounds like a jackass for talking down to citizens and building the moral high ground for this deputy because he obviously above shooting a chicken, right?
Ridiculous and sad that the Escambia County Sheriff even says you should be glad he and his office have a “modicum of character and integrity” for NOT ARRESTING A DEPUTY WHO COMMITTED MULTIPLE FELONIES, BUT DID NOT SHOT A CHICKEN.
Public safety in Escambia County is officially a joke. EMS is falsifying certification, failing to train EMT’s. The fire department well, that is a known issue. They both fall under Public Safety in Escambia County.
In the past several days, Escambia County has seen changes in personnel at the management level. After some rumbling about poor leadership and questionable management practices individuals at the top levels are gone. The employees spoke out and received some well-deserved attention. The Escambia County Professional Firefighters, the representing union, took the initiative to act against labor practices that caused the employees to lose confidence in the leadership. The union brought attention to the problems that plagued the employees. The result was favorable to the employees and those performing inadequately in leadership positions are no longer hindering progress of those simply doing the job they are being paid to do.
The recent news is refreshing to many in other parts of the
county working for inept leaders. The Escambia County Sheriffs Office is
another example of a county agency void of effective leadership. The ECSO has
been under the microscope for some length of time. Complaints of LET fund
mishandling to numerous lawsuits of misconduct or mistreatment of employees are
at a high never seen by any other Sheriff in this county.
The Northwest Florida Police Benevolence Association, the
representing union for ECSO employees, could learn some moves from Professional
Firefighters. If some action was taken by PBA to expose the corrupt practices
that have become so common at the ECSO. The employees could work again with
some degree of confidence the leadership had the ability to effectively lead
the agency. Exposing the corruption would place in the open how ineffective and
destructive David Morgan has been during his time as Sheriff.
The PBA was criticized during the budget debacle in 2018.
Eric Haines used the leverage a raise would have on officers and open a
contract that was not due to be negotiated. Haines lied to the BOCC and to any
citizen that he tried to sway to his side of the argument. Haines was aware he
could use the raise to strong arm the union. He didn’t care about the deputies
getting a raise. He wanted to spend someone else’s money to achieve a
diabolical goal of stripping the contract PBA had negotiated.
Haines argued continuously that the main problem facing the
ECSO was officer retention. The truth is poor leadership is the cause of
officers leaving the agency. The numbers do not show that the pay increase
helped ECSO retain officers. The mass departure of experienced officers to
other agencies continues to burden Haines. The main cause of failed leadership
practices is the person that can determine the solution and there would be
little expectation of Haines firing himself. He still believes he was an actual
The Firefighters had less reason to complain than the
officers at the ECSO. It is public knowledge that a Federal Judge has
determined in a court decision that Haines had a bias toward female employees.
It would be reasonable to believe that Haines should be removed from his
position and Morgan should be investigated by the Governor. Any person in a
leadership position should not be bias toward male or female. It is either
ignorance or arrogance for Morgan to ignore the opinion found in court
documents concerning Haines unprofessional behavior toward females. Morgan has
the ultimate ability and a sworn duty to protect employees from predators like
The PBA should understand that sitting back playing catch up
is not proven to be the best plan to achieve success. The ECSO has an
observable history, with Morgan and Haines at the helm, that would demonstrate
an absence of conscious and ability to take the agency into the future. The
employees have the right to be protected by the union. The dues payments of the
employees are for the purpose of job protection and PBA is responsible to
attempt to provide that protection. All employees should call on the President
of PBA to form a plan and seek a path that is best for employees. It can be
done and was just proven to be an achievable goal by Professional Firefighters.
Kudos to the Firefighters for having the courage to make your own path and demand the leadership your professional talents deserve. Now the ECSO should be next to be evaluated, perhaps by the Governor as Doug Underhill suggested.
The most ironic part of that suggestion is that if the Governor does get involved it will be the entirety of local government that will be investigated including Underhill, who has been caught inappropriately using grant money to the tune of over $2m from the feds and state. He was asked to repay the money back to the county because he usurped money that he was not entitled to.
Bottom line, when you call 9-1-1, you are taking a huge risk of getting an inexperienced, poorly trained first responder, be it EMT, firefighter, or deputy. This is what the county is today.
Every time the public encounters a law enforcement officer, all the experience they have EVER had with police, ever seen other people have with police, and also every story they have ever heard are present. Every story they heard on the news about the breach of trust in overzealous and lawless cops are sins that every cop carries to every encounter. More times than not, the public lacks confidence that law enforcement will help them if they need it, make arrests if necessary to provide a measure of justice.
This has never been no truer than in recent years. In order for a community to feel safe and in turn, be safe, is to have a measure of trust that law enforcement assigned to guard them from harm is actually doing just that. The people must feel and see law enforcement as the good guys doing good work. When that ceases to be the case, public unrest leads to crimes against police, and vigilantism can develop to overcome the sense of helplessness when law enforcement is not there to help for one reason or another. This hurdle has to be addressed by leadership in law enforcement. Perception is reality to people.
Having said that, my hometown of Escambia County, Pensacola, Florida, is facing an epidemic of ECSO lawlessness. WEAR had a story last week about this same issue but the story you are about to read is a separate incident and it is a distressing story has come to me and frankly it should scare the hell out of everyone who lives in the county.
The details are that a neighbors’ squabble results in one neighbor calling ECSO on another playing loud noise on the porch. When the ECSO arrives, the music is off. No more issues, right? Wrong. Deputies arrive and unbeknownst to them, there are outside cameras. Watch for yourself.
The biggest problem here is the report of the incident here:
The two are not even partially the same. The report is pure fiction. Why is that? Because the resident involved called to report the stolen stereo. He spoke with Sgt. Jason Young, who told him that the deputies would NOT ARREST him for disorderly conduct and in exchange they would return his stereo. Arrest him? No crime was committed other than the stolen stereo. But this is the manipulation to act as if Young is doing the resident a favor, for in turn not making any waves about the stereo. This unfortunately is a common thing. Assuming people don’t know their rights and believe if a deputy does it, it must be legal is a fallacy that most in this ECSO administration count on.
This report shows the lengths of the cover up and perjury that several deputies entered into in this one incident. Frankly, if so many will risk their badge and effortlessly cover up something like this, one has to question what major things are handled just the same. This one act of a deputy committing, what amounts to, an armed robbery is white washed and covered up because it was thought the resident would not know their rights.
The most egregious part of this is that this resident is unemployed and not in a financial position to make a fuss. He’s a vulnerable citizen. When law enforcement abuses power, people, like this resident are typically the ones they abuse because the victims of their abuse are marginalized by a criminal history, poverty, or both. When people of power victimize the most marginalized in their charge, that is such a deep violation of public trust. No one is safe.
One of the most important founding elements of this country lies in the varying checks & balances. The Founding Fathers knew that it is likely that one entity or facet of government will overstep; therefore, another facet would have to oversee or sign off, as it were.
Strangely enough, the ECSO is not privy to any oversight on the bulk of their budget. The fundamental problem with that is the clear misappropriation of LET funds exposed over the years by this agency. Currently, they are still out of compliance with Florida Statute on that, because they are not following up with the receivers of state/county funds to make sure it was spent properly. That is one of the checks and balances to verify there is no misappropriation by the agencies in receipt of money spent by the county. It’s common practice to require follow up documentation to show where the money went. Most agencies have banned organizations from future funds if they refuse to comply with this follow up accounting. They are shut off from state/county money. Why is this necessary? Governmental accountability….plain and simple. Trust but verify, as Ronald Reagan said.
So we still have millions of dollars being unaccounted by the ECSO, then I find out through varying requests that there is so much more that the ECSO juggles that never sees oversight. With the LET records being dubious at best, and the deputy raises that were provided for by the county but never trickled down to the deputies over the past years (as exposed in the budget impasse of late) when will taxpayers and the county coffers demand accountability and hold the ECSO up to the fiduciary standard that the rest of the county is held to?
This agency can charge a fee for gathering public records if a request is made. Few requests will have any costs associated with the request. If a person is told there is an exorbitant fee for a record request that should garner attention. Unless the request is so labor intensive, or requests information not normally maintained, the majority of the public records requests are easily gathered. In today’s technology world records are available with a few keystrokes in most cases.
Recently, a question was raised about the Escambia County Sheriffs Office involving money. Specifically, where certain monies go, since there is no account that that the ECSO has to deposit into, such as a checking account. It is not something that shows up in the official budget. There must be existing records. Simple request, right? This public record should be answered in a matter of minutes. But, because the ECSO is the agency that has the record, it will no doubt be overcomplicated to jack up the “fees” associated with research, or they will simply state “no records exist”. These are the standard 2 answers when a public records request comes in for information, the agency does not want to disclose. Any request that would expose Morgan as the inept law enforcement official he is always is met with unprecedented push-back as well as any request that requires the ECSO to explain where they are hemorrhaging tax dollars will be met with resistance.
In this case, the money being properly unaccounted for is money related to off duty employment. The ECSO has a policy in place that defines what the procedure is for deputies working “off duty” employment. The policy has a minimum amount deputy will be paid. It also has what the deputy must do to be allowed to work “off duty” jobs. One requirement is that a deputy must pay a fee off two dollars an hour back to the ECSO. The ECSO keeps record of how many hours each deputy works each month. The deputy is then sent a bill that is paid to the ECSO (cash only for a long time, but now they accept debit cards).
This is Accounting 101. Cash is paid to the ECSO and they could easily furnish records about transactions involving a bill and a payment. But how much money does the ECSO collect from the deputies that pay a fee for working off duty each month? Where does the money go after it is collected? Is it considered income for the ECSO? Is there a requirement to report this income to be taxed? Has it been reported? No trick questions there but important questions that require an answer from the ECSO.
Oh, and I have told repeatedly that the ECSO has no duty to answer questions–only provide public records. They “are not inclined to or have the responsibility to” answer questions, according to Chief Deputy Eric Haines. Oddly enough, every other facet of Escambia County government I have dealt with, including the state attorney’s office, is remarkably willing to answer any questions about process and procedure. It is just the ECSO that is not.
And as we know the ECSO has proven that they are not honest with money issues. It may seem as if off-duty money collected is not a substantial amount of money, but for example, Navy Federal Credit Union is a regular off duty job opportunity for the ECSO. Deputies working that job alone have paid over $1500 back to the ECSO. Now consider that Navy Federal is one of hundreds of locations that have deputies throughout the year. The amount of income collected from the deputies for off duty security employment is thousands of dollars each month. This should not be considered insignificant. There is a former Sheriff in prison for misappropriating taxpayer money. The amount of misappropriated funds in the other Sheriff’s case was far less than the funds in question here.
Shouldn’t the media get involved with this issue? We are talking about multiple millions of dollars. Just in the past week, a Grand Jury was not pleased or impressed with how Escambia County handles money issues or oversight of the money grossly mishandled in Century. The dollar amount in question with the ECSO is at least triple the amount of money being questioned in Century. Wouldn’t a grand jury be even more appalled to see the reckless lack of oversight of the ECSO? Is it not a concern of comptroller or county administrator that there is likely (based on the brief preview of the LET fund) mishandling of the amount of money involved here? Accountability about how funds are handled should be everyone’s priority. It is time to ask these questions as well as the questions, others have. If the media is not going to ask questions and hold officials accountable, the citizens must do it.
Look for updates concerning this topic. If anyone decides to make requests or has information about this, please feel free to share with everyone.